About Me

Name: W. Austerman
Email: wausterman@aol.com Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

A letter to John McCain

Dear Senator McCain,
   In March you got the last primary you needed. In September you got the nomination. So why, for the Love of God, in November did you not get the votes??? Is it because of your so cool “Maverick” style that you mentioned every where you went during the campaign??? The same “Maverick” style that has been in support of Abortion by choice, free speech violating campaign finance reform, Gay Marriage, and Amnesty. Is it because you attack your Republican colleagues who vote against your bills, like when you dropped the F-Bomb on Sen. Cornyn after he voted against your “Amnesty” bill??? Or is it because you put so much of your campaign’s time and money into lost causes Pennsylvania and New Hampshire that it cost you Ohio and Florida at least??? The answer is all the above. By rallying the party around you to put you into the White House, you put fear into some of the party’s most Conservative candidates, and fear is contagious. It spread from the party to the voters and led to people voting for the other guy. Further more, in states where voters could just mark on their ballot straight party, people voted straight Democrat just to avoid voting for you, and in doing so may have cost other Republicans their seats in Congress, state legislatures, or even local office. Lucky for you, however, you still have your seat in the Senate. But you don’t get all the blame, oh no sir. While your only saving grace was picking Sarah Palin as your running mate, a portion of the blame goes out to the Republican voters of the states that you won during the primaries. While there were other, more Republican, choices to choose from, our party nominated the one who was approached by John Kerry in ‘04 and asked to be his running mate. After the ‘92 election we had signs that said “Don’t blame me, I voted for Bush”. You don’t deserve that little bit of honor. I’ll be spending the next 4 years saying “Don’t blame me, I wanted Fred” thanks largely to you.
 
Respectfully,
Warrington Lee Austerman
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Austerman's Endorsements

I don’t know about you, but I think endorsements are important. They allow us to see where some famous actor stands or what company gets the most business from a candidate. It also allows us to see how conservative or liberal politicians are. For instance, I’m a big fan of my Republican Governor, Rick Perry. The man is a hero to me, but when he endorsed Rudy Giuliani for president I was surprised. Mr. Giuliani was clearly the most liberal republican choice and Gov. Perry is quite the conservative. However I learned something from his choice. There is no doubt that Mr. Giuliani is a go-getter and tough on crime and that is exactly the kind of attitude that Gov. Perry wanted for President. However I feel that endorsements should be reserved for the ones you agree with on what is most important to you and not just party politics. That’s why at the start of this I endorsed Fred Thompson for president. Mr. Thompson and I agreed on so many issues that I learned a lot form his policies and from his political career, not just in his campaign for president but from his years of service in the Senate. So I present to you my endorsements for the 2008 Election Year.

On the Federal Level, I continue to have reservations about Senator John McCain as President. The one reservation that sticks out most is on the issue, as I said before, what is most important, and it is important to me that our border with both Mexico and Canada are secure and that we remove those who are here illegally without amnesty. John McCain wants amnesty for those who are here illegally. Oh sure, he dose not call it that, but in his mind the job would be a whole lot easier if we just granted them legal status instead of having the INS do its job by finding any potential terrorist already here on our soil. Mr. McCain also has not been clear about making tax cuts permanent, banning abortion or protecting the sanctity of marriage. That is why I can not in good conscience endorse John McCain but I am 100% against Barack Obama becoming president. However I do endorse Governor Sarah Palin for Vice President. Gov. Palin is more conservative than Senator McCain. She is strong and a go-getter. She will shake up Washington and I expect she will keep McCain on his toes. Most importantly, as a lifetime member of the National Rifle Association she will protect our right to bear Arms.

Now to the Great State of Texas. In the race for U.S. Senate I endorse the incumbent, John Cornyn. Sen. Cornyn is one of the truest conservative republicans serving in the Senate. As Senator he speaks for the conservative cause defending the War in Iraq, the troop surge and the commander of U.S. forces in Iraq. Cornyn also defends the tactics we use to find terrorist, and techniques necessary for use to get life saving information out of terrorist. He is also for making tax cuts permanent and my personal favorite abolishing the Estate Tax. On the issue of immigration Sen. Cornyn stood up to President Bush by voting against the same amnesty plan that both the President and Sen. McCain want. However he dose want the border secured with more men, technology, and a fence. Before becoming senator he held positions in the Texas Justice system including the state supreme court and then defended the state as Attorney General, making him the ideal choice for a seat on the federal bench. Finally John Cornyn has an A rating from the NRA with his record votes of defending gun owners and gun manufacturers. You can trust John Cornyn, I do.

Now I would like to extend my approval of ballot initiatives I support occurring in other states. To the people of California, I hope you will approve Proposition 4 to prohibit a minor from having an abortion with out proper and timely approval from the minor’s parents. It is important to protect the sanctity of life and in doing so protecting our children. I also hope you will approve Proposition 8 to reverse your state supreme court’s ruling allowing gay marriage. By passing this proposition you will protect the sanctity of marriage and prove your high court legislated from the bench. I also extend the same wishes to the State of Florida in passing proposition 2 and the State of Arizona for proposition 102. Finally, I call on the State of South Dakota to pass your proposed ban on abortions except in the case of rape, incest, or where the unborn child becomes a threat to the mother’s health. I hope you do become the first state since Roe v Wade to force this issue beck before the Supreme Court.

In closing I would like to say to all, Vote Freedom, Vote Life, and Vote NRA. God Bless

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Colin Powel goes Liberal.

Last night while looking at the latest headlines on Matt Drudge’s Drudge report, I came across a surprise headline that I thought was bound to be a mistake (Not faulting the Drudge Report). The headline read that former Secretary of State Colin Powel, a strong Republican, would be endorsing Barack Obama’s Campaign. So you can imagine my surprise when I got up this morning to read on the Drudge Report that it was true. During Mr. Powel’s interview today on NBC’s Meet the Press he said he think Obama is a “transformational figure“ and, “He is a new generation coming ... onto the world stage and on the American stage. And for that reason, I'll be voting for Sen. Barack Obama.” Powel continued his defend his choice saying “I would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court” and criticized Republican Vice Presidential Candidate Sarah Palin saying “I don‘t think she’s ready to be President of the United States”. He also based his decision on the changes of the Republican Party saying “the party has moved even further to the right” and he “would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court”. He didn’t even point out any flaws in Obama. Now let’s break this down.

Colin Powel says Barack Obama “speaks with great insight into the challenges we're facing of a military and political and economic nature.” HELLO, he wants to pull our troops out of Iraq as soon as he takes office and by doing so undermines exactly what they are doing and ensures that every soldier who gave their life for the freedom of the Iraqi People and the safety of our country will have died in vain. I would expect someone like Colin Powel, who served in a war where our troops were brought home before the job was done, like Vietnam to understand that.

Colin Powel says, “I think that [Obama] has a definite way of doing business that will serve us well,”. Is it going to “serve us well” when he raises the taxes of the rich forcing companies to charge more and that in turn forcing his precious middle class to pay more for gas, food, and clothing??? Is it going to “serve us well” when a universal health care plan goes into effect forcing everyone to have their medical treatment limited and controlled by the government instead of themselves???

Colin Powel said he “would have difficulty with two more conservative appointments to the Supreme Court”. Yeah, God forbid we have another conservative justice or two who will make decisions according to the constitution and not legislate from the bench and do something constitutional, like ban abortion or not undermine the War on Terror.

This is not about race. This is not about a change in Washington. This is about doing the right thing for the good of the country. Neither candidate wants to do that. So we are stuck with who is going to come close to doing that. Raising taxes, forcing universal health care down our throats, making us look weak to both our allies and our enemies by withdraw from Iraq, and denying our right to bear Arms IS NOT in the best interest of this country. Now Colin Powel has a history of service to our country. Served in Vietnam, commanded a battalion of 101st, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, a national security adviser, and secretary of state, and to top it all off he is a Republican. Now here we are with him endorsing the most liberal member of the US Senate. Just last week Powell gave the McCain Campaign the $2300.00 maximum contribution allowed by law and now he’s giving Obama the one thing that matters most, his vote. I had great respect for Powel, but today I have lost my respect. I’m hurt, and I’m sure there is at least one man or woman serving in the Army, Air Force, Navy, Maries, and Coast Guard who feels the same way.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What is the most important issue???

As a gun owner I feel the Second Amendment is the most important political issues of all. As a proud member of the National Rifle Association I receive, on a regular basis, information on this issue that could affect the safety of this country. For my Second Amendment blog issue, once a week I will bring you the latest on your right to bear Arms. I’ll kick off my first pro-gun post with a victory just in from New Orleans, Louisiana. For those of you who may not know the story about gun confiscation during the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, because the big media networks didn’t broadcast. After devastating punch by Mother Nature in August of 2005, Hurricane Katrina left New Orleans in a mess. The city was flooded with Sewage, confused survivors, and looter. These looters, organized and armed with stolen weapons from the stores they looted (a local Walmart, to name one) put the city into chaos. From chasing girls in the middle of empty streets and raping them out in the open, to taking up sniper positions around a hospital in the middle of evacuating and opening fire, to looting flooded homes. Common sense dictated that if you were ignoring the city’s recommendation to leave town and staying to defend your property then you better own a gun. Most of the people who did stay behind did just that, but most of these people soon learned that the looters were the least of their worries compared to the government. City leaders handled the situation in so many wrong ways. One of which was the city’s position of forcing people out of their homes and disarming them. Democrat Mayor Ray Nagin as an anti-gun mayor had no problem with the New Orleans police on mission to disarm any person they could get there hands on and then lie about the city confiscating guns. When the chief of police went on TV and said “No one will be armed, we will take all weapons.” From that point city police, parish sheriff deputies, state patrolman, and even national guardsmen focused their attention on those they could find huddled up in their homes as opposed to armed looters running around the streets shooting into the air. Gun owners were harassed, some assaulted, forced out of there homes, and thrown on a bus out of town. There guns were confiscated illegally, some even deliberately damaged or destroyed by police right in front of the owner. Don’t believe me??? Watch this video by the NRA care of you tube. When the owners made attempts to get their guns back they got nowhere. That’s when the NRA got involved. After getting lawyers down to New Orleans to hear from these victims and securing video evidence necessary to prove the lies of the city government, the NRA filed motions and eventually sued the city. On Friday it came to an end. The City agreed to settle the lawsuit, and a permanent injunction was issued against the city, Mayor Ray Nagin, and current Police Chief Warren Riley. Judge Carl J. Barbier presiding over the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, signed the permanent injunction against New Orleans. The city admitted the firearm confiscations carried out by Nagin and Riley was unconstitutional and illegal. Under the terms of the injunction, Mayor Nagin, Police Chief Warren Riley, and any agents or employees of the City must, among other things, cease and desist confiscating lawfully-possessed firearms from all citizens; make an aggressive attempt to return any and all firearms which may have been confiscated during the period August 29 to December 31, 2005; post on the City website the procedure for the return of confiscated firearms; and mail notices to all individuals who are identified on the property tags of firearms in the City's possession which were confiscated during the aftermath of Katrina. Now I want you to think about what you just read. Government sanctioned gun confiscation in America. This is the basic reason why there is a Second Amendment and the NRA, for times like Katrina’s aftermath and to fight a government that would take away your basic right to defend yourself against Katrina’s aftermath. God Bless the NRA. Now in closing I’d like to remind you that one of the ways to fight anti gun government is at the polls this November by electing the pro-gun candidates who will uphold your right to bear Arms. You can find out who that is at the National Rifle Association Political victory Fund. This web site uses your zip code to find out what election races are happening in your area and gives the candidates a grade on their position of the Second Amendment and indicates who is being endorsed by the NRA. On this site you will see that the NRA just endorsed John McCain and Sarah Palin for President and Vice President. Sen. McCain has maintained a pro-gun record during his years in Congress and Gov. Palin is well known in her state as a moose hunter, gun owner, and she is a Life Member of the NRA. So if you want to maintain your right to bear Arms Vote NRA on Nov. 4.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »